This question came to me as I was watching Shaun of the Dead, a great little comedy horror zombie movie that I'd heard called "low budget." The movie appeared low budget by normal Hollywood standards (I'm not knocking it), but I wondered what exactly "low budget" means. I found out here, on The Numbers. Shaun cost $5M to make, which seems like an awful lot of cash to me, but in the big picture, it is not. The movie has already grossed over $26M worldwide. Clearly, it's a profit deal!
I've come across The Numbers site in the past but had never really taken a close look. The most expensive movies to make were Spiderman 2 and Titanic, each at $200M. On the other end of the spectrum, The Brothers McMullen, a movie I liked and featured recognizable actors, only cost $25K. Clerks, a classic, cost just $27K. Blair Witch Project $35K. Blair Witch was also the most profitable movie based on return on investment. Not bad for a movie that has gotten mocked to no end -- a movie I enjoyed seeing in the theater with absolutely no preconceived notions. Napoleon Dynamite is the 6th most profitable movie in history and should continue to rise as its following grows.
In keeping with a common theme of this site, the first two Project Greenlight movies:
The Battle of Shaker Heights -- $1M production budget, $280K U.S. gross (no data for worldwide).
Stolen Summer -- $1M budget (not actually on The Numbers site), $120K U.S. gross.
I posted this information because I found it interesting and because I wasted an hour or so on The Numbers today -- I thought I'd share the Time Suckage with you.



Recent Comments